Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Music Literacy in the Suzuki Method

This is mine.  My paper for Composition Theory class.  No touchy.


Introduction

            I’m interested in exploring how the process of learning to speak is analogous to the process of learning to play music and how that is shown in the Suzuki Method’s mother tongue approach to teaching.  In the mid 1900’s, Japanese violinist, Shin’ichi Suzuki realized that if young children could so easily learn even the most challenging of languages, then they also have the ability to become talented musicians.  He created a theory of teaching instrumental music that was based off of the process of children learning their native language.
            This “mother-tongue approach” is two-fold, first, it is strongly grounded in full immersion in music, and secondly, it is very concerned with creating a community of musicians.  This is taken undoubtedly from Vygotsky’s theory of social learning.
            I want to investigate how constructs of language such as grammar and punctuation translate into the “language” of music and how they are learned and taught.  In both languages, learning is almost exclusively oral, with words being spoken aloud and notes being played by ear and not by reading them off a page, and both “languages” social learning reigns supreme.  

Supplemental Information

            Mostly, Suzuki programs are based in the public school systems, or less frequently, there are independent schools of music that offer this training.  It is common for children to start learning music very young, although this is not always necessary.  This program was first designed for violinists, but has since been expanded to many instruments, although Suzuki has its heart in the string family.

Conceptual Framework

            I’m interested in the analogous nature of music to language and how that forms the basis for this movement in music education style.  This is the concept of literacy, and how one can be “literate” in many different things, such as interacting in certain social situations and learning how to use an internet search engine.  Since music bears a certain similarity to languages—communicative, structured, reading, writing, speaking/playing—it will be interesting to explore this possibility though the lens of the Suzuki method.
            I’m interested in the social learning aspect of this program, that is, the community of those who are literate in music that the child slowly becomes a part of, like how a child slowly joins a culture of those who speak a certain language.  The child-instructor relationship is very crucial to this and so is the relationship between the students as they can also mentor each other.  The concept that relates to this is Vygotsky’s sociocultural learning theory.

Methodology
           
            My research was a combination of remembering my childhood and Googling the Suzuki method.  Firstly I got a brief overview of the method from the Suzuki Association’s website, then I watched a ten minute documentary on YouTube.  I remained on YouTube, watching videos of five year olds playing the violin at their recitals and being taught in lessons.  Eventually, I got bored of that and started looking up pictures on Google Images that best represented the Suzuki method.  I chose the internet as my main source since it is so easily accessible in comparison to almost anything else.  There was no real need to track people down and interview them, or to try and sit in on a class.
            I also did a lot of thinking about my own experience in my school’s Suzuki Strings program that I was a part of from the third grade until I graduated.  I remembered some things I had forgotten and tried not to be too nostalgic about it. 

Findings
           
            During my research, I noticed that there seemed to be two main things that the Suzuki method boiled down to, that is the community of musicians that the child is brought up in and also the idea that music should come as naturally as speaking. 

            The community of musicians, that is, those that are literate in music, is analogous to the community that is literate in the child’s native language.  Made up of peers and parents and teachers, they are a support system for the child’s learning progress as the child learns the language, in this case, music.  The parents provide literacy opportunities first, in the home, before the child goes to school, they have to make sure the student practices their instrument in a similarly natural way to the way that they practice speaking and reading.  It ought to be as enjoyable and as praiseworthy as learning new words is. 
            It is fairly common for one of the students’ parents to learn to play the same instrument as the child, in just the same way that parents speak the same language as their child.  The child becomes more invested in the learning process and more enthusiastic if the parent-child relationship is played upon.  The young student will have more to gain by becoming literate like their parent(s) because the parents are “stimulating the child’s desire to imitate” them (Piano Key, Suzuki Piano Method).  This also fosters the parent-child bond, and creates a very safe and supported space for the child to explore their new literacy.
            An important part of the literate community is the celebration of the child’s accomplishments.  Just as they are rewarded and praised for saying their first words and eventually learning to speak properly, so too are they praised and celebrated for becoming literate in their instrument.  It is common practice in the Suzuki method to have recitals that mark certain achievements in the students’ progression.  These are usually the completion of a book, which is a collection of increasingly difficult pieces of music that the student learns.  The most popular of these recitals is always the child’s first one, which can range from all the students in the entire grade, to a single student.
            In these concerts, or recitals, the student is always accompanied by their instructor, either on piano, or on the instrument the student plays.  This practice is to create a supportive environment for the child so that the recitals do not have the stress associated with a final exam type of situation because that is not the purpose of such events.  They are intended to be enjoyable celebrations of learning and music and so the student must not be made to feel pressured.
            In the learning of one’s native language, this recital is probably the equivalent of a child being able to read his bedtime story aloud alongside the parent. 
            Much of the Suzuki method is seemingly inspired by, or at the least, similar to the theories of the psychologist Lev Vygotsky.  Although Suzuki’s quest was to create generations of people that were, ultimately, better people, with “noble hearts”, in practice, his teachings were very grounded in the socio-cultural theories of the Soviet psychologist.  If we take away the moral philosophies, Suzuki’s work amounts to a new and effective, scientifically grounded way to teach music. 
           Vygotsky’s concept of the Zone of Proximal Development, ZPD, refers to the things that a child is learning to do.  In our case, it is to play music.  At the low levels of the ZPD are the things that the child do on his own and at the higher levels are the child’s potential abilities that may be achieved with the help of a skilled teacher.  Since the students are involved in small lesson groups, these teachers may also be their peers, perhaps an older student, or one who is naturally talented at a certain skill.  For example, a student who has better vibrato than another can share their insight with a struggling peer (photo from suzukiassociation.org).  More commonly, in the upper level orchestral groups, the section leader will suggest bowings and fingerings for the rest of the students in their section.  Granted, they will probably require the teacher’s approval, but it is the section leaders that take the initiative if something doesn’t feel right, or can be made easier.
            It is also very important for the student to be constantly exposed to the sounds of music, just as they are constantly exposed to the sounds of their native language.  For student in Suzuki programs, this is mainly achieved by listening to recordings of the pieces that are in the books, although it is certainly not limited to that.  The recordings are performed by professionals and serve as guides for what the students ought to sound like.  This isn’t to say that the students must imitate the player on the recordings, but rather that it is a good example of good tone and precision.  Recordings exist in the language-learning world as well; tapes of native speakers saying things like “Where is the bathroom?” or, “Hello, my name is” so that students can hear all the inflections and accents that would be incredibly hard to pick up on from working with text alone.  Listening to music is good for musicians in the same way that reading books is good for writers; they get more exposure to the craft, can be inspired, or can notice something they couldn’t have before.  Live music also falls into this category since it has all the benefits of listening to the recordings, but with the added benefit of being able to learn about the performance aspects of music.  Students are encouraged to attend as many music performances as they can, especially if these performers are their peers, which further helps to create the community.

Reflection
           
            If I could have done this project differently, I may have picked a slightly different topic, since researching the learning of music-as-language was rather challenging.  I was probably looking in some of the wrong places.  It would have been interesting to find a connection with Ong’s “Writing is a Technology that Restructures Thought” and investigate how music affects the thought processes of humans, if it even does at all.  I suspect that it would be rather similar to the oral culture when the child is learning to play by ear, and then perhaps there may be a change in their thoughts as they learn to read music, just as when people gain the written word.

            My understanding of the term literacy has changed over the course of this project because I had the unique challenge of examining musical literacy through the lens of language literacy.  The two line up surprisingly well, but sometimes it is a challenge to think of how it is possible to immerse a child in music as fully as they are immersed in their native languages.  If I had more time, I’d want to study how adults learn music and how it differs and is similar to the way that young children learn music.  The adults, of course, will probably have a harder time than the children, since adults lack the extreme neuroplasticity of children.  Perhaps there are people who retain this quickness of the brain, are they the ones we call geniuses?  

Monday, May 4, 2015

I dropped off the face of the earth...I'm sorry

I had a wee bit of a mental breakdown.
yes, just like that.


But now I'm back to normal.  Because normal exists...


Hopefully posts will be fairly regular again, but I can't make any promises.




Sunday, November 23, 2014

"Nature" (what does that even mean?)

I think that the humanities are vital to our understanding of “nature” since it is a complex concept that stretches across many disciplines of study.  If we were to merely look at this concept and phenomenon through things likes chemistry and ecology, then we would be failing to understand a significant portion of “nature”.  The word “nature” itself has two basic definitions, one is the physical world and the forces within in, but another is the traits and characteristics that define something.

This is a video about the video game, Skyrim, and in that game are these humanoid-tree creatures
 these things, that attack you if you go out into the wilderness and run into them.  
Now, this clip is relevant to this essay, because in it the player and the humanoid-tree have a conversation/confrontation that illustrates the different definitions of "nature".  Skip to 1:27 and watch until 2:00. Also, there is swearing, so if that's offensive, then....
 
            In his essay The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis, Lynn White touches on this dichotomy in the first paragraph—he mentions Aldous Huxley’s discussion of “a favorite topic: Man’s unnatural treatment of nature and its sad results.”  Huxley appears to have a different idea of how humanity should be interacting with nature than others.  In this sentence, White uses the two different meanings of the word “nature” in conjunction with each other.  He goes on to his main point, which is that the mainstream Christian view of  a natural relationship with nature is actually quite harmful to the environment.  It is this second definition, “natural” that is the realm of the humanities.  What one believes to be “natural” is quite subjective, as White’s mention of Huxley’s view demonstrates. 
            An example of this confusion and ambiguity of interpretation can be found in the argument surrounding gay rights.  Someone may say that homosexual behavior is “unnatural” and therefore should be discouraged.  This implies that heterosexual behavior is “natural” and therefore intrinsically better than other sexual behaviors. But the same idea of what is “natural” can also be used to the opposite effect—someone may say that since all individuals are born with their sexual preference already in existence it is therefore “natural” for homosexuality to exist.  They may also point to examples of other animals besides humans who exhibit homosexual behavior, and say that homosexuality is not just an abnormal behavior created by the human race, it is common to all animals, therefore it is “natural” and should not be discouraged.  Both of these statements present slightly different definitions of what qualifies as “natural” with vastly different outcomes.
            This definition of “nature” has a strong philosophical quality to it, and is most often first found in religions, therefore it requires knowledge outside of the disciplines of science to understand it completely.  And we must understand it completely.  Throughout history, failures to understand have often resulted in catastrophes.  For example, if the Medieval Europeans had better understood their fear of witchcraft, prejudices against practitioners of Paganism or other non-Christian religions, and the motivations behind the publication of the Malleus Maleficarum, then there would have been less mass hysteria and less people tortured and murdered for non-existent crimes. 

            So, a failure to understand the human perspective on something, “nature” in this case, is a failure to understand its true depth and significance.
I tried to link out to a website showing the failings of the Malleus Maleficarum, but there wasn't one source that had everything I wanted it to say without a bunch of expository stuff.  So do your own research because I have to go rake leaves.

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

Facebook Literacy

1) People post links instead of just explaining them.  You have to be able to read.  News stories are all about the same subject, like an epistolary story.  People have arguments prompted by the posts.  If you visit a page, chances are that you are interested in the subject.  It’s like a social performance of everyone agreeing and rallying around their beliefs.  They make new terms that are contextual, ex: “traditional” + “marriage” in the dictionary does not mean the same thing as “traditional marriage” as discussed on an LGBTQ page.
2) Profile pictures are giving brief descriptions of themselves – how they want to be seen, communicated quickly.
3) Online practices are generally more exaggerated of offline practices.  ex: people are waaaay meaner on the internet than they would be in person.  Trolls (no evidence). 
4) Publically shown private discussion on walls.  If it’s really private and you don’t want anyone to see you go to chat.  It’s awkward if an older relative comments on a conversation.  When it’s a birthday, everyone says “Happy Birthday” even if they don’t know them – it’d be rude for the birthday person not to “like” all the posts or to send out a generic “thank you”. 

5) Using ‘like” to end an awkward conversation that is going on too long.  If it was in person you’d say “oh, it’s 2 o’clock I have to get going!” but you wouldn’t type that out on Facebook.

Monday, November 17, 2014

Ethnography questions on Chicago Mexicans

1.      How is the ability to read and write distributed in a community?
Lower class is less literate, upper class/wealthy have increased literacy.  Education is expensive.  Older Mexicans have less schooling than their children.  Birth order matters as well – younger kids get to go to school at the expense of the elders.
2.      What is the relationship between the abilities to read and write?
Sometimes you can learn to write before learning to read – learning the symbols…but not the meaning (??)  Limited, contextual knowledge.  We assume that reading comes before writing – that’s how it is in our school systems. 
3.      How do these abilities vary with factors such as age, sex, socioeconomic class, and the like?
SEE ANSWER ONE
Girls tended to help out at home, boys go make money.  EX nine year old with dead mother and father in US went to work
4.      With what kinds of activities are reading and writing associated, and in what types of settings do these activities take place?
Church, writing letters to family members who aren’t in US.  That’s the biggest motivator for learning writing/reading.  Maybe a bit for work?
5.      What kinds of information are considered appropriate for transmission through written channels, and how, if at all, does this information differ from that which is passed through alternative channels such as speech?
Literacy is learned through speaking (somehow).  Learning is a speech thing.  The letters are described.  Our brains hurt.  Written things are personal communiques – not particularly complicated.  Maybe that’s how they can learn to do it?
6.      Who sends written messages to whom, when, and for what reasons?
Letters.  SEE OTHER ANSWERS
7.      Is the ability to read and write a prerequisite for achieving certain social statuses, and, if so, how are these statuses elevated by other members of the community?
People who can write are used to write letters for others.  Social responsibility/status.  They are sought out for their services. 
8.      How do individuals acquire written codes and the ability to decode them--from whom, at what age, and under what circumstances, and for what reasons?
At all ages.  If you don’t have formal schooling, you’re going to need lots of motivation in order to learn to read and write.  It’s harder to accomplish as you get older.  EX Cigarette box man.
9.      What are the accepted methods of instruction and of learning both in and out of school?
In school – reading is first, then writing.  Outside of school others can teach you.  You’re going to have to get creative if you can’t find resources.
10.  What kind of cognitive functions are involved?
Symbolic thinking (understanding what a symbol is EX “A”).  Problem solving. 
11.  In summary, what positions do reading and writing hold in the entire communicative economy and what is the range of their social and cultural meanings?
Those who are literate get more attention from the community, their skills are in demand.  Those who can read & write English are more integrated into the US society.  Literacy bolsters the economy.  EX Avocado town.  Literacy expands your social “market” – you can reach new audiences and communicate better.  Also, higher paying jobs require literacy which elevates socioeconomic status. Literacy equals more opportunities in the US.
            live the whole year in Mex
            Chicagoans sending $ to Mex

            ½ & 1/2 

Monday, November 10, 2014

Response to Chapter 14: Tenets of Sociocultural theory in Writing Intstruction Research

is one nasty reading.  Very dense.

Scaffold (tool for understanding) given to us by Professor Silva (thanks!)

Sociocultural Theory Writing Prompt

What is sociocognitive apprenticeship?What is an apprenticeship?What does cognitive mean?What would be a cognitive apprenticeship?What would be a social apprenticeship?What would be a sociocognitive apprenticeship?

Interpret this quote: “Rather than viewing knowledge as existing inside the heads of individual participants or in the external world, sociocultural theory views meaning as being negotiated at the intersection of individuals, culture, and activity” (p. 208).

Tools include a variety of mental, linguistic, and physical devices used to enhance writers’ performance, including notational systems, writing symbols, instruments, diagrams, graphic organizers, text structures, mnemonics, writing implements, procedures, rules of thumb, grammar and spell checkers, and any tool used in the transformation and construction process....These tools support cognitive performance by helping writers to organize mental reasoning by offloading aspects of thought or functions onto the tool, and by making elements of the activity more visible, accessible, and attainable….” (p. 211). In what ways does this writing formula, which is learned in high school, support cognitive performance: All paragraphs should follow this structure--Main Idea, Evidence, Analysis, Link (MEAL).  In other words, in what ways does it organize thinking, offload aspects of thinking, and make writing and thinking more visible?
Compatible with Vygotsky’s thinking, procedural facilitators offer semiotic tools that enable teachers to make visible the character of the particular text forms, the strategies and procedures that underlie the text’s construction and revision, and the discourse structures and language practices that permit writers to realize their writing goals” (p. 213) 
What is a community of practice? What are its characteristics?
Sociocognitive apprenticeship - working alongside an expert, expert leads by example, like a teacher reading a book to her class or a teenager learning to drive by watching parents
Cognitive/semiotic tools - asking questions, defining words, making connections with prior knowledge, examples


What would happen if the whole world became literate?

I'm not sure if it would be too terribly different from the world we're in now.  Literacy rates across the globe are the highest they've ever been, so I would just expect more of the same.
We'd probably be getting an influx of thought from old native cultures who have formerly not joined the global community, because of language and social barriers.